4 ms·
Yes, but it was still was trained on a large dataset for the purpose of drawing. It's not an AGI that just happened to be asked to draw bicycles. Maybe a bette
by dtech 4y ago
Yes, but it was still was trained on a large dataset for the purpose of drawing. It's not an AGI that just happened to be asked to draw bicycles.
Maybe a better comparison would be a trained artist, who likely wouldn't make such egregious mistakes.