Hm. I have three responses to this: 1. It seems similar or at least parallel to something I wrote about needing new metaphors for social networking: http://blo

Hm. I have three responses to this: 1. It seems similar or at least parallel to something I wrote about needing new metaphors for social networking: http://blog.byjoemoon.com/post/7072771434/a-new-metaphor-for-social-networking http://blog.byjoemoon.com/post/7072771434/a-new-metaphor-for... 2. We need our social networking software to give us better representations of social context, and good representations of that context through UI. 3. Maybe it's the case that the different services will evolve into different contexts, with a different service for every context? I.e. Twitter for shouting pithy aphorisms into the public void, G+ for conversing about nerdy stuff, HN for conversing about even nerdier stuff, LinkedIn for marketers to market to each other about marketing jobs, and FB for farming?