4 ms·
I think he meant something like this: true == !0 == "0" == false Which still isn't that interesting, since it is much the same as: true == (false ==
by DougBTX 18y ago
I think he meant something like this:
true == !0 == "0" == false
Which still isn't that interesting, since it is much the same as:
true == (false == false)
More interesting, something like:
> ! 0 == "0"
false
> 0 == ! "0"
true
Since "!" acts as if false === 0.