4 ms·
> I don't understand how knowledge of a broad amount of words maps to creativity? It's not exactly, but from first principles, using it as a proxy does make so
by Hermitian909 4y ago
> I don't understand how knowledge of a broad amount of words maps to creativity?
It's not exactly, but from first principles, using it as a proxy does make some sense.
A robust finding in the educational literature is that creativity is generally limited by how many things you know that are relevant to the topic at hand e.g. people who've never programmed before are not actually good at writing creative programs (there's a subtle distinction here where the end goal of the program may be creative, but how they go about getting there is unlikely to be creative).
So, very roughly, if you consider someone knowing more words as a proxy for them knowing both more concepts and having more connections between those concepts, you would expect them to have more creative output on topics of general interest (on average).
source: former educator
- tshaddox 4y agoUsing it as a proxy would make more sense if the instructions said to try to choose the most obscure words you know.
- 0x20cowboy 4y ago> It's not exactly, but from first principles, using it as a proxy does make some sense. How so? If I asked you to take a test in Mandarin Chinese, I would assume you would know less words, but wouldn't you be just as creative in your mind? (I admittedly did not take the test.)