> Concerns included flood risks based on updated projections of sea-level rise, the location in an industrial area “with a history of contamination problems” an

> Concerns included flood risks based on updated projections of sea-level rise, the location in an industrial area “with a history of contamination problems” and higher costs for water that would probably mean “significant burdens” for low-income communities, which they said would raise environmental justice issues. Please. The objections are largely the usual NIMBY types and concerns.