4 ms·
Not running JS is both more efficient and more minimal than running JS, and so like the parent is saying, doing all that just to display a blank page without JS
by cercatrova 5y ago
Not running JS is both more efficient and more minimal than running JS, and so like the parent is saying, doing all that just to display a blank page without JS is kind of ironic.
- Kaze404 5y agoNot running CSS and HTML is even more efficient. How can you call your website efficient if it isn’t just plain text served over TCP?
- cercatrova 5y agoYes, plain text would be even better. It's not a gotcha if I agree with your sarcastic comment unironically.