It doesn't seem to be a very historically accurate or cover modern examples where OOP works well. The original OOP was Simula 67 used for simulation that doesn'

It doesn't seem to be a very historically accurate or cover modern examples where OOP works well. The original OOP was Simula 67 used for simulation that doesn't use the definition of OOP in the video. I have no idea where that one comes from. I'd say maybe 50% of application code I see (not write) are web UI/clients. Something like React with OOP components work very well. Same goes for mobile or UI's in general. The argument would be more persuasive if it used a more common definition of OOP and concrete examples of both good and bad applications to show which kinds of cases fit and which don't.