3 ms·

I'm not so sure this is any good measure. From running it a few times it's easy to get an very high score if you pick extremely specific words that are not ofte

I'm not so sure this is any good measure. From running it a few times it's easy to get an very high score if you pick extremely specific words that are not often used together. For example the words "Chair" and "Mountain" have a score of 78. While the words "String" and "Quark" have a score of 86. "String" and "Quark" are much, much more related though via String theory then a chair and a mountain. Basically if you know many obscure words you will have an easy time getting a much higher score.

mym1990 5y ago
1) No specialised vocabulary 2) Only the first score is valid, as they recognize that gaming the test is much easier after the first go. So maybe instead of “string” or “quark” you go “physics”. I may be wrong, but I think having very general knowledge over different topics will spur more creative thinking because specific knowledge will be less likely to be helpful in a completely different domain(not 100% of the time obv, but just a personal thought and generalization).