I think that both reversing the power status and changing the relative amounts is doing the analogy some harm. In my opinion a more relevant analogy is: Car de

I think that both reversing the power status and changing the relative amounts is doing the analogy some harm. In my opinion a more relevant analogy is: Car dealership approaches person and asks to buy their car for $2500. Person says “Naah, price is $50,000 bro”. Dealership says: “Sure”. Here I believe it’s more clear that the person is in fact not obligated to part with their car unless they take the required additional step of agreeing to the purchase and finalising all documents.