4 ms·
Jump themselves repudiated this view of the exchange when they agreed to subsequent larger amounts. This is a transparent ploy to use the power of the state to
by puffoflogic 4y ago
Jump themselves repudiated this view of the exchange when they agreed to subsequent larger amounts. This is a transparent ploy to use the power of the state to seize private property at a price that the current owner does not consent to sell at, and the only question is whether the law will recognize this or ignore it.