4 ms·
After doing it for real, I tried it a few more times with a cryptographically random shuffle. Interestingly, the computer got a worse score on average. Method:
by runlevel1 4y ago
After doing it for real, I tried it a few more times with a cryptographically random shuffle. Interestingly, the computer got a worse score on average.
Method:
I started `irb`, and picked like so:
require 'securerandom'
# Coin flip
12.times { p [:heads, :tails].shuffle(random: SecureRandom)[0] }
# Dice roll
10.times { p (1..6).to_a.shuffle(random: SecureRandom)[0] }
# 10 dots
10.times { p (1..9).to_a.shuffle(random: SecureRandom)[0] }
I disconnected from the internet before the scores were submitted so as not to taint the survey. (Ranking calculation happens offline based on a CSV of scores loaded into the browser early on.)
Results:
For: "Your answer got a higher random score than X% of people in the study."
Me: 46%, 71%, 59%, 72%
Computer: 32%, 20%, 47%, 31%
My sample size is obviously too small for anything conclusive. However, I'll admit it makes me a little suspicious that something else is amiss.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]