4 ms·

They serve a public purpose - it's something people (citizens = voters) can use to shield themselves from economic bullshit ruining their lives by limiting the

They serve a public purpose - it's something people (citizens = voters) can use to shield themselves from economic bullshit ruining their lives by limiting their financial exposure. I don't really see the value in having millions of entities working on a goal such as changing the course of climate change in their own (and thus inefficient) way. I think it's much better to let these entities focus on what they do best, and then take money from them, and use it to further these goals in a much more optimal way.

dragonwriter 4y ago
> it's something people (citizens = voters) can use to shield themselves from economic bullshit ruining their lives by limiting their financial exposure. That “financial bullshit” is specifically “liability for unlawful harms to other people caused by actions undertaken for the benefit of those granted the special protection”. If the laws providing liability are bullshit, they ought to be eliminated.
- emteycz 4y ago
  That's not the bullshit I was speaking of. :-)