4 ms·
It was largely wrong then, too. Cloudflare, who really kicked off a large amount of the fuss, had "Bronze" class Xeon chips, that weren't designed or marketed
by Twirrim 5y ago
It was largely wrong then, too. Cloudflare, who really kicked off a large amount of the fuss, had "Bronze" class Xeon chips, that weren't designed or marketed for what they were attempting to use them for. They were only ever intended for small business stuff. Not large scale high performance operations. Their performance downclock for AVX-512 is way, way higher on Bronze.
- NavinF 5y agoWeren’t those chips $10k each back then? Hardly anyone got gold Xeons.
- Twirrim 5y agoNot even close. The blog post was 2017. Actually, I stand corrected, after double checking, Cloudflare were using Silver. Entry level data centre chips, instead of small business chips. Still not the kind of chips you'd buy for high performance infrastructure, and not intended to be used for such. Xeon Silver 4116s hit the market at $1,002.00. The Golds were $1,221.00. The performance differences are quite significant. For something that'll be in service for ~3-5 years, $200 is absolutely trivial by way of a per-chip increase. It's firmly in the "false economy" territory to be skimping on your chip costs. It's a bit more understandable in smaller businesses, but you just don't do it when you're operating at scale. Also remember: at the scales that Cloudflare are purchasing at, they won't be paying RRP. They'll be getting tidy discounts.
- NavinF 5y agoI’m not familiar with the model numbers. What’s the gold equivalent to the Xeon Silver 4116? Anyway I’m sure they compared the TCO of buying more low-end chips vs fewer high-end chips.