> I guess most other people would read it that way Not me. But as I said upthread, that's the only way I can construe the question as being coherent. And I agr

> I guess most other people would read it that way Not me. But as I said upthread, that's the only way I can construe the question as being coherent. And I agree that the question thus construed invites the experimental subject to make predictions about the behaviour of others; so the question tests the subject's accuracy in psychological judgements. If you construe it as being a coherent question. I think it's silly to construe it that way; I just think it was a crap question, and you can't draw any conclusions at all from the results.