> You're arguing that C++ makes safety improvements over C. I broadly agree, but that's not the topic at hand. C++ is still quite plainly not a safe language.

> You're arguing that C++ makes safety improvements over C. I broadly agree, but that's not the topic at hand. C++ is still quite plainly not a safe language. The topic at hand is not what your purporting it to be either. You seem to be thinking that the topic at hand is C++ is a language that touts itself to be safer then python. And you are responding to me as if I made that claim. I never did. Obviously the person you're responding to is making the claim that C++ does tout itself as "safer" then C but not necessarily "safer" then python. But he is responding to an Actual claim you made saying that C++ doesn't tout itself as safe.