3 ms·
They do include this graphic of prior results. Looks like they got much further than expected in the past. I’m guessing this means they’re less likely to see ne
by ianai 5y ago
They do include this graphic of prior results. Looks like they got much further than expected in the past. I’m guessing this means they’re less likely to see new stuff in the first interactions than the later with heavier products of the first interaction.
https://media.nature.com/lw800/magazine-assets/d41586-022-00711-5/d41586-022-00711-5_20356530.jpg https://media.nature.com/lw800/magazine-assets/d41586-022-00...
- pmayrgundter 5y agoThere's also this cool thing to look for: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability Up near z=115 and n=180. Buut, looks like this beam won't get there yet and nothing on the horizon "Radioactive ion beams (such as 44S) in combination with actinide targets (such as 248Cm) may allow the production of more neutron rich nuclei nearer to the center of the island of stability, though such beams are not currently available in the required intensities to conduct such experiments." But maybe we'll get lucky!