3 ms·
You took one for the team. If the world ran on good software, you'd not cautiously deposit only $25 first and you'd not be tempted to stress-test the system wit
by afiodorov 4y ago
You took one for the team. If the world ran on good software, you'd not cautiously deposit only $25 first and you'd not be tempted to stress-test the system with the $10k deposit. If the world ran on good software, the second $9.975k deposit wouldn't have bounced. Don't worry, I'll get back at them in my work by making the users suffer until they understand what good software is!
- LocalPCGuy 4y agoIf the software was good, it would have either returned an error prior to withdrawing funds on the 2nd transaction ($10k), or the return would be $25 (and then it's fine the 3rd transaction failed). Only as a third option would the 3rd transaction be the one that is accepted after rejecting the 2nd entirely. But lots of ways to "fix" bad software.