3 ms·
> if you assume the participants are the same set of actors - which would make sense - then it would be very easy for a majority of network control to be held b
by everfree 4y ago
> if you assume the participants are the same set of actors - which would make sense - then it would be very easy for a majority of network control to be held by a Google, an AT&T, a China Telecom, etc.
Why wouldn't one just design such a system to give each entity equal sway over the network? One entity, one vote.
- jimmydorry 4y agoWhat would stop an entity creating many other entities to sway voting outcomes? This would be referred to as a Sybil attack. I think you would need something like a web of trust (each entity is responsible for the actors they vouch for). Otherwise, some kind of proof of how many users they represent.
- everfree 4y ago> What would stop an entity creating many other entities to sway voting outcomes? A hard-coded initial entity set, along with a voting process for additions to and removals from that entity set. In other words, a classic DAO design.