4 ms·
But if their guess is 50/50, that is from a subset that is mostly under-60's, which presumably means that they have evidence for the opposite? (i.e. there is n
by Closi 5y ago
But if their guess is 50/50, that is from a subset that is mostly under-60's, which presumably means that they have evidence for the opposite?
(i.e. there is no statement that the 51% figure is age adjusted)
I'm probably just being silly here...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Freeboots 5y agoI think they're saying over or under 60 is completely arbitrary when judging only from 'random' answers. It could be over or under a month, or 1000 years, the result would still be 50/50 because the ability to create a sequence that appears random has no link to age.