3 ms·
No, the type for `get` would only have a single layer of `Option`. But V is a type parameter, so you can instantiate it with another layer of Option. You don't
by ebingdom 4y ago
No, the type for `get` would only have a single layer of `Option`. But V is a type parameter, so you can instantiate it with another layer of Option. You don't need to (and shouldn't) modify the type signature of the `get` method. It's already generic.