Yes. Without a supporting statement, it's ad hominem. But I provided a supporting statement. This is the issue I'm taking about: https://mobile.twitter.com/ric

Yes. Without a supporting statement, it's ad hominem. But I provided a supporting statement. This is the issue I'm taking about: https://mobile.twitter.com/richgel999/status/1464435786808504332 https://mobile.twitter.com/richgel999/status/146443578680850... Which links to here: https://github.com/phoboslab/qoi/issues/35 https://github.com/phoboslab/qoi/issues/35 It got so bad even John Carmack told him he was out of line: https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1464639553046728709?s=20&t=cLeah7KdXrz0TGaU4iOsNA https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1464639553046728709... Where everyone agrees, yes, the image should be removed. They didn't know about its history. Would he please stop being a gigantic asshole about it. So if that's not blowing things out of proportion, I don't know what is.