This would just incentivize automation. Also the typical company-labor relationship is not one where labor could be considered to be "creating" or driving the

This would just incentivize automation. Also the typical company-labor relationship is not one where labor could be considered to be "creating" or driving the industry - laborers can leave at will and any ownership they have in the enterprise doesn't make them any more or less of a laborer. Passive-aggressive "do something for the sake of doing something" legislation is harmful as it makes the law unclear, enables regulatory capture, and foments the current litigious landscape that only makes lawyers rich.