I guess if you put it that way, the statement might be correct. But the disparity between US and UK being so big, I feel like the argument is a bit weaker. Usin

I guess if you put it that way, the statement might be correct. But the disparity between US and UK being so big, I feel like the argument is a bit weaker. Using the average on such a small set doesn't seem to be so useful if there is such an outlier. There are some interesting lists here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_laureates_per_capita https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_lau... I guess you could also look at laureates by country born, considering many people went to the US in WW2. But I imagine it'd just devolve into senseless nationalism.