I think they name them all in Figure 10 in the actual paper [1]. But it doesn't seem to contain a rank ordering of the mathematicians that is easy to recover.

I think they name them all in Figure 10 in the actual paper [1]. But it doesn't seem to contain a rank ordering of the mathematicians that is easy to recover. Also, it appears there is data duplication with the first four names appearing twice in the list (first four and last four). [1] https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0088-y/figures/10 https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epj...