3 ms·
We might be stuck with compuserve and AOL.
by davrosthedalek 4y ago
We might be stuck with compuserve and AOL.
- vidarh 4y agoWe had the internet before the web, and we had gopher. So we had an open network, the client server model and links. What the web brought was a more flexible protocol and document format. That was important, but there's no way we'd have been stuck with compuserve or AOL.
- SiempreViernes 4y agoDo you remember the time when messenger services were open to third party clients? You could actually talk to all your friends using only one app! Those days have ended.
- efitz 4y agoDo you remember the AIM/MSN wars, where AOL was literally building buffer overflows into their protocols to prevent MSN messenger from interoperating? There never was a golden age of interoperability on the internet, at least not after HTTP. Maybe there was a lot of cooperation when it was purely academic in the late 70s and 80s. BBS operators often were cooperative. But commercial internet has always and forever been cutthroat.
- vidarh 4y agoI could not talk to all my friends on only one app, as the vast majority of people were not online. If anything, a far larger number of people are still on open services today than were back then; there are just even more people on locked down services. But why you brought this up in a discussion about the invention of the web, I have no idea.
- webmaven 4y agoDo you remember Microsoft's Blackbird: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbird_(online_platform) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbird_(online_platform)
- jacquesm 4y agoWe may well be stuck with the equivalent of those again, only we'll call them Google and Facebook.