4 ms·
> No one entity should have this level of power. Who’s agreeing that it has such power in the first place? > take a website with a freeform, limited size text
by s5300 4y ago
> No one entity should have this level of power.
Who’s agreeing that it has such power in the first place?
> take a website with a freeform, limited size text input field so seriously.
Who takes Twitter so seriously?
Does it really need 4chan level of disclaimer saying “don’t take this so seriously” ?
- judge2020 4y ago> Who’s agreeing that it has such power in the first place? In support of this, Twitter has a metric "monetizable daily active users". So while, in the United States, they have 68 million monthly active users, the amount of mDAUs is 38 million. While 1/10th of the United States is certainly no small feat, Facebook is probably the real issue with >250 million monthly active users in the United States[1] (I couldn't find a similar daily metric). 0: https://www.statista.com/statistics/970911/monetizable-daily-active-twitter-users-in-the-united-states/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/970911/monetizable-daily... 1: https://www.statista.com/statistics/247614/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/247614/number-of-monthly...
- ufmace 4y ago> Who’s agreeing that it has such power in the first place? > Who takes Twitter so seriously? All of the people flipping their lid about it being bought out. If it truly has no power, why would anybody care who owned it?