3 ms·
doesn’t really track, if that were the case then why are women ceos still generally paid less than male counterparts? if women were suppressing men in an effect
by micromacrofoot 5y ago
doesn’t really track, if that were the case then why are women ceos still generally paid less than male counterparts? if women were suppressing men in an effective way wouldn’t it show up statistically somewhere? where’s the data? most evidence points to the contrary
- zmgsabst 5y agoThere’s no evidence that points to the contrary and your comment about CEOs is the “summit fallacy”. It’s possible for men to both earn more at the extreme end and for them to face systemic sexism in other ways. Further, CEOs are a snapshot of the labor market 20-30 years ago and not as it exists for most people today. You’re also ignoring clear evidence of male floundering, such as the abysmal college graduation rates.
- micromacrofoot 5y agoyou don’t think there’s any evidence of sexism against women? for real? ceos didn’t stop existing 30 years ago? what a strange comment what is summit fallacy? do you think men graduate college less because of sexism?