4 ms·
Well it is objectively surmountable and if it personally isn’t to them that means that the money is more important to them than achieving that goal to make a bu
by presentation 4y ago
Well it is objectively surmountable and if it personally isn’t to them that means that the money is more important to them than achieving that goal to make a business. I don’t see how this isn’t a choice? “I’m not doing it since the insecurity of not having a high income is scarier than my desire to open a business”
That said I do bet that if you try to do your thing and it really doesn’t work out you probably can go back to software afterwards if you’re open to the risk of burning through your savings in the process.
- throwaway413 4y agoBecause putting food on the table so your family can eat isn’t a choice. Don’t have savings to burn through as you do that? Then it’s not a choice. Just one example. Morality may not be objective, but it surely isn’t just personal either. That’s what makes it a nuanced discussion, and not just a choice one makes. By deciding you want to do that in the future but first you need to save, are you deprioritizing it, or prioritizing it indirectly?
- dzikimarian 4y agoMost people in his country put food on family table without US-level software developer salary. It's hard to lower expectations of life quality, but let's not dramatize.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]