3 ms·
a) "big money" -- (such as retirement accounts or other institutions) -- don't care about "retail." They have to follow certain risk regulations and plans and w
by eftychis 4y ago
a) "big money" -- (such as retirement accounts or other institutions) -- don't care about "retail." They have to follow certain risk regulations and plans and will follow them, and that's it. Market makers will try to drive ahead of the market in an effort to provide liquidity (and make money to live and prosper in the process).
b) Robinhood was "blocked" because it decided to not do any serious risk management. And by blocked we mean it didn't have the cash that the clearinghouse required to service them.
c) No the collateral is for the clearance. The margin you refer to is what Robinhood lends you the customer. They are handling (mishandling in the case of Robinhood) their own equivalent side to be able to provide you with those stock trades.
What you see as a successful trade is only the execution of the trade -- that is someone has agreed to buy or sell at the price you asked/bid for. Next someone (broker + clearing house) needs to clear (Robinhood fucked up here) and then needs to settle. The clearing house takes the risk in case one of the counterparties falters or becomes insolvent, to ensure transactions do happen. It takes 2 days to trade (execution to settlement) non-options in most systems I am aware of these days.
c') Robinhood was just blind sided when its clearinghouse said "Hey, you know you actually just have way more buys that are more volatile than normal to the point of issues at clearing is 1, so increase your collateral." Robinhood said:"No money." Clearinghouse: "No worries, no trades, until you change your risk profile."
(Here is a quick link (just googled, couldn't find a better article I like) outlining the process https://thismatter.com/money/stocks/settlement-and-clearing.htm https://thismatter.com/money/stocks/settlement-and-clearing.....
P.S. (@Edit): Also the brokers can not legally touch the customers' "hard cash" money and post it to cover their own obligations -- that would be commingling and let us say it is not good. I am not going to even begin imagining the issues, but people continuously get screwed due to commingling of funds.
- freemint 4y agoYes but it could give users the option to lend money to Robinhood to perform the transaction or have no transaction.