4 ms·

> And this isn't even touching on the reputation hit of companies did this. What reputation hit? The past 20 years of tech has shown that people in general don

• autoexec 4y ago
  > What reputation hit? The past 20 years of tech has shown that people in general don't care about privacy. I don't think reputation is really an issue for most major companies at all. People can't keep up on every sin committed by corporations and quickly forget. Gerber and Beech-Nut have been found to sell baby food full of heavy metals. Literal poisons in dangerous amounts spoon fed into the mouths of our children, but they haven't gone out of business. DuPont knowingly poisoned people (and ultimately every last one of us) but somehow that doesn't matter. They're still operating and profiting. There are countless examples of companies who have done plainly evil things leading to deaths and suffering and yet they face zero meaningful consequences. Not from government, and not from people "voting with their wallet" Companies only seem to care about their reputation because it can have an impact on profits in the short term which happens to be what many companies are overly focused on anyway. Don't want stock prices to drop even a little for a few months before everyone moves on to the next scandal.
• Manuel_D 4y ago
  Even if people don't care about privacy, they'll care about the network costs and battery drain from transmitting all this audio. If the audio is being parsed on the edge device it'd cut down on network costs, but result in even more battery drain.