3 ms·

You expressly agree to give the video to 3rd parties and copyright holders. They provide them to 3rd parties and get paid. The third parties with take a few f

by ipaddr 5y ago

You expressly agree to give the video to 3rd parties and copyright holders. They provide them to 3rd parties and get paid. The third parties with take a few frames and will run through AI and categorize the film for the ad networks. Rights holders will check content against hashes. Law enforcement will have a handy copy available. Which makes friends and business opportunities.

lovehashbrowns 5y ago
The video these cameras capture is tens of gigabytes of data. I think you can expect about an hour worth of video on 1TB. It’s completely impractical to think they’re taking your video from the camera itself. It’s also likely to be useless footage for anyone but the person creating the content. Keep in mind the video will still need to be edited for color, adding or removing sound, and cropped. Then spliced into a final product. It’s also useless for rights holders because 1. It’s easier to hash on the camera and send the hash only, not your video. And two, the camera isn’t recording the final product so there’s likely no music yet. Finally, for a professional video shoot, you’d acquire the rights anyway. Double finally, as a rights holder it’s far easier to do a content claim on YouTube, Netflix, Vimeo, or wherever the content is going to end up rather than on the first step of the process, the camera. I don’t even know what law enforcement would want with random video footage of outtakes for a small, medium, or large video production.
- hedora 5y ago
  They reserve the right to pull video content and other data from your computers as well. That could include edited scenes, scripts, emails, zoom calls, etc, etc.
  - lovehashbrowns 5y ago
    The EULA does not suggest that they do, unless you’re referring to something else. > You agree that RED and its affiliates may collect, maintain, process, transmit, and use technical, diagnostic, usage and related information, including but not limited to information about your RED Camera, Camera Module, computer, system and application software, usage, content, and peripherals. It specifies “information about…” It also just doesn’t even make sense for RED to want any of those things. We’re talking about a company that makes money on cameras and overpriced peripherals.

by ipaddr 5y ago

lovehashbrowns 5y ago

The video these cameras capture is tens of gigabytes of data. I think you can expect about an hour worth of video on 1TB. It’s completely impractical to think they’re taking your video from the camera itself. It’s also likely to be useless footage for anyone but the person creating the content. Keep in mind the video will still need to be edited for color, adding or removing sound, and cropped. Then spliced into a final product. It’s also useless for rights holders because 1. It’s easier to hash on the camera and send the hash only, not your video. And two, the camera isn’t recording the final product so there’s likely no music yet. Finally, for a professional video shoot, you’d acquire the rights anyway. Double finally, as a rights holder it’s far easier to do a content claim on YouTube, Netflix, Vimeo, or wherever the content is going to end up rather than on the first step of the process, the camera. I don’t even know what law enforcement would want with random video footage of outtakes for a small, medium, or large video production.

hedora 5y ago
They reserve the right to pull video content and other data from your computers as well. That could include edited scenes, scripts, emails, zoom calls, etc, etc.
- lovehashbrowns 5y ago
  The EULA does not suggest that they do, unless you’re referring to something else. > You agree that RED and its affiliates may collect, maintain, process, transmit, and use technical, diagnostic, usage and related information, including but not limited to information about your RED Camera, Camera Module, computer, system and application software, usage, content, and peripherals. It specifies “information about…” It also just doesn’t even make sense for RED to want any of those things. We’re talking about a company that makes money on cameras and overpriced peripherals.