> Science reporting is not great but colloquially people use 20W per <job done> as a way of meaning Watt-hours. After watching the video I can confirm that it'

> Science reporting is not great but colloquially people use 20W per <job done> as a way of meaning Watt-hours. After watching the video I can confirm that it's actually 20Wh/l for 0.3l/h and 15Wh/l at 1l/h (I'm a bit puzzled how that works, but hey - that's what the inventor says). > It could be worded better but I think this is what they're trying to say is that they're consuming 6W. I would be happy if they'd manage to simply repeat what was said in the video. This is the official MIT news portal after all and I would expect it to be run by people smart enough to use the correct units, but alas...