2 ms·
The trailing "per liter" seems the problem: I think maybe what they mean is that 20W gets you 0.3 liters per hour? So their machine produces 0.3 liters per hour
by denton-scratch 5y ago
The trailing "per liter" seems the problem: I think maybe what they mean is that 20W gets you 0.3 liters per hour? So their machine produces 0.3 liters per hour, and draws 20W?
I wish journos wouldn't bandy around terminology and statistics they don't understand. It's getting worse.
- SamBam 5y agoIt isn't, though, because that would be 60Wh per liter, but the video actually specifies it's 20Wh per liter. They just stupidly used watt instead of Wh in the article text.