4 ms·
At first I assumed it was because of liquidity problems and not because they wanted to screw customers. But in the hearings later he refused to answer a bunch o
by autosharp 4y ago
At first I assumed it was because of liquidity problems and not because they wanted to screw customers. But in the hearings later he refused to answer a bunch of easy questions. E.g. the following meme is literally what he said: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lngem6/do_you_think_he_realized_it_yes_or_no/ https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lngem6/do_y...
Q: "Do you realize that you literally manipulated the market. Yes or No?"
Vlad: "Thank you for the great question. When I was a boy in Bulgaria [ladida]"
If he had been honest in his dealings then he wouldn't have had to evade every question posed to him.
- blahblah123456 4y agoNah, not true. In a legal proceeding, always say the minimum. It's never to your benefit to talk to law enforcement (or congress in this case).
- mirceal 4y agoforget legal proceedings. If RH did the right thing AND was transparent with their users there wouldn’t have been any legal proceedings
- tyrfing 4y agoCan you link to the transcript or recording of this question and response? I am unable to find it.