3 ms·
On its last iteration of cores, SiFive had shrunk the gap to being only within 2 years of ARM's best processors. Yet catching up simply couldn't be done before
by snvzz 5y ago
On its last iteration of cores, SiFive had shrunk the gap to being only within 2 years of ARM's best processors.
Yet catching up simply couldn't be done before because RISC-V was lacking functionality. As of December's 15 new ratified extensions, this is no longer the case.
Several companies are currently working on high performance implementations.
One of them is Tenstorrent, where there's a team led by Jim Keller working on this. It is supposed to enter the market near the end of this year.
I do suspect it is going to take less than 5 years to see RISC-V take the performance crown.
- paulmd 5y agoThe problem is "ARM's best processors" are still significantly behind "the best ARM64 processors"/"apple's best processors". ARM is just making crappy smartphone reference designs, Apple is significantly ahead in the performance processor segment.
- snvzz 5y agoM1 definitely is great, but I wouldn't call the high end ARM designs crappy. Cortex-A78 and X2 are strong.