4 ms·
If you had read the article, you would have learned that the state can't do that, and why they can't. That's what the entire article is about.
by jdlshore 4y ago
If you had read the article, you would have learned that the state can't do that, and why they can't. That's what the entire article is about.
- sytelus 4y agoThe article says "Under the U.S. Constitution, a state can only impair an existing contract if the impairment is reasonable and necessary to serve an important government purpose.". I hope you can see how broad and left to interpretation this is. In the worst case, state can modify its constitution and compell to disolve this specific contract. Courts only exist to protect the constitution and they need to follow the law created by legislature. Courts are not there to create new laws.