4 ms·

I've never heard of this, but it looks nice. Anyone can compare with firefly-iii?

• slwoslownsn 4y ago
  It’s far less flexible of a system than firefly-iii. That said it actually (lol) functions well with any amount of historical data. Firefly-iii slows to a crawl with just a few years of data. Actual handles nearly a decade worth of data (imported from YNAB4) with ease.
  • muhehe 4y ago
    Interesting. I never managed to get too much of data into firefly, because of API rate limiting (and was too lazy to modify the code) :)
• sirtimbly 4y ago
  I've used both. firefly-iii is a fairly good, easy to maintain and host, web app. It's not as good design or UX as Actual - especially since firefly-iii has no mobile experience to speak of. Acutal had great mobile apps. firefly's budgeting interface is a bit of a UX mess.