3 ms·
I don’t think I should be physically present in the USA just because I transferred money to a USA citizen in exchange for services. However USA law defines thi
by dismantlethesun 4y ago
I don’t think I should be physically present in the USA just because I transferred money to a USA citizen in exchange for services.
However USA law defines this, I think is wrong. That’s what I’m saying.
The USA is an outlier in many ways. It taxes it’s citizens outside of the country, forces awkward bilateral trade agreements , and is not at all harmonized with work laws of other countries.
An office is a physical presence to me. A single person working from their own house is not.