I was thinking this too. It would be one thing if the expectation were that you would come into the office you previously worked out of, because that would give

I was thinking this too. It would be one thing if the expectation were that you would come into the office you previously worked out of, because that would give you the option not to have to travel as long as you didn't move away, but suddenly adding a travel requirement for those people would suck. It does make more sense to me if that stays an option, and it's only the people who do move away who would have to travel. That way people could choose the perk of living elsewhere, knowing they would have the downside of traveling quarterly. But for people who were hired on to an office job with no travel requirement shouldn't suddenly have a travel requirement so that their coworkers who move away have it more convenient. It might even be enough of a change in working conditions for someone to quit and be eligible to draw unemployment benefits. (I used to adjudicate claims, and a significant change in working conditions is one of the ways you might be eligible for benefits even if you quit instead of being laid off.)