> It’s less of a strawman than it was a simple example of where discriminating among multiple candidates is okay. Why add such an example here? No one has clai

> It’s less of a strawman than it was a simple example of where discriminating among multiple candidates is okay. Why add such an example here? No one has claimed that discriminating among multiple candidates is never okay. I'm simply challenging the idea that the law is a useful guide as to whether discrimination is ok. I like a phrase you used. Decisions should be based on "judgment (not pre-judgment)".