>Accelerate the destruction of the fish ecosystem? It's already being run at capacity, ditching quotas will give you more in year 1 and a total disaster in subs

>Accelerate the destruction of the fish ecosystem? It's already being run at capacity, ditching quotas will give you more in year 1 and a total disaster in subsequent years. Most sharks are endangered species; which do you want to make extinct for a political point? I know the great lakes very well. We are maybe around 5% capacity there, possibly far less. I believe your confusion might be that you misunderstood when I said massive seeding effort. Oceans are less than 1% capacity. I couldn't even fathom to tell you how many zeros are in that small fraction of 1 percent. In terms of sharks, great whites, tigers, bulls, hammerheads. All are 'vulnerable' or less but certainly not endangered. Yes there's a handful of endangered shark species but none of those would be your typically targeted types.