3 ms·

> The skilled trades are almost defined by getting very good at solving a select few problems over and over again, whereas engineering can almost be defined as

> The skilled trades are almost defined by getting very good at solving a select few problems over and over again, whereas engineering can almost be defined as constantly solving new problems (or problems in new or ever-changing contexts). Skilled workers don't solve the same problems over and over again, they solve variations of them based on the same principles. In that sense I'm not sure it's all that different from what most computer scientists actually do. Most don't advance the state of the art.

ghoshbishakh 5y ago
Most scientist in any field don't really push the state of the art. But yes it is their job to push it. If you take a look at computer security, then cryptographers and computer security scientist constantly push the state of the art. Some areas of CS are already very much polished compared to others. For example computer networks is much stable than machine learning.
- cinntaile 5y ago
  My interpretation is that the article is just talking about people with a bachelor's or master's degree in computer science. In the same vein I just call them computer scientists, but they are different from people that do science at a university. I expect scientists at universities to push the state of the art.
  - feoren 5y ago
    One of the exciting things about the immaturity of software engineering is that you don't need a Ph.D. and years of study to push the state of the art. You just need to get pissed at that stupid library why is it doing it this way UGH FINE I'LL WRITE MY OWN! Grats, you're pushing the boundary of the discipline.
  - ThrowawayR2 5y ago
    > "My interpretation is that the article is just talking about people with a bachelor's or master's degree in computer science." Like Linus Torvalds or Theo de Raadt, both BS holders IIRC? A bachelor's degree from a good CS program is enough to prepare anyone who studies well to do what they did.
    - cinntaile 5y ago
      That wasn't my claim either so I'm unsure why you point this out? You don't even need a degree to push the state of the art.

ghoshbishakh 5y ago

Most scientist in any field don't really push the state of the art. But yes it is their job to push it. If you take a look at computer security, then cryptographers and computer security scientist constantly push the state of the art. Some areas of CS are already very much polished compared to others. For example computer networks is much stable than machine learning.

cinntaile 5y ago
My interpretation is that the article is just talking about people with a bachelor's or master's degree in computer science. In the same vein I just call them computer scientists, but they are different from people that do science at a university. I expect scientists at universities to push the state of the art.
- feoren 5y ago
  One of the exciting things about the immaturity of software engineering is that you don't need a Ph.D. and years of study to push the state of the art. You just need to get pissed at that stupid library why is it doing it this way UGH FINE I'LL WRITE MY OWN! Grats, you're pushing the boundary of the discipline.
- ThrowawayR2 5y ago
  > "My interpretation is that the article is just talking about people with a bachelor's or master's degree in computer science." Like Linus Torvalds or Theo de Raadt, both BS holders IIRC? A bachelor's degree from a good CS program is enough to prepare anyone who studies well to do what they did.
  - cinntaile 5y ago
    That wasn't my claim either so I'm unsure why you point this out? You don't even need a degree to push the state of the art.