2 ms·
Is there any good reason releases don't have the ISA they target in the filename or path? Going by the screenshot, I am guessing it'll require x86_64, and that
by snvzz 5y ago
Is there any good reason releases don't have the ISA they target in the filename or path?
Going by the screenshot, I am guessing it'll require x86_64, and that I should built it myself for some other architecture (which ones are supported? This is not easy to find either, yet it belongs to the bulletpoint list in the front page).
- jackpot51 5y agoI'll add that, I would definitely have had that if something other than x86_64 was supported
- snvzz 5y agoGood work. There's not anywhere near enough people working on non-bankrupt OS designs. Too much bad design (UNIX-like, drivers in the kernel, global namespaces, ambient security) out there.