4 ms·
I need to investigate this "maths disqualifier" because it completely blows my mind that companies are actively patenting the application of statistical machine
by tepitoperrito 4y ago
I need to investigate this "maths disqualifier" because it completely blows my mind that companies are actively patenting the application of statistical machine learning models to their domain.
For example Xometry has successfully patented "METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTIONS OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES"[0]. To me there is literally nothing novel here, they are just describing the results of using an existing stats tool in the "manufacturing" domain, preventing other companies from sharing how they do stuff like this for fear of being sued.
I read that patent as saying if you work for a CNC machine shop you can't run random forest on a CSV of your own data unless you get granted a license to by a potential competitor.
[0] https://patents.justia.com/assignee/xometry-inc https://patents.justia.com/assignee/xometry-inc
edit:fixed link
- extropy 4y agoCurrently there exists a widely used "being used with hardware" hoophole that allows taking pure maths and adding a bit of hardware in there "a memory unit" "a processing unit" "I/O unit" and have a valid patent.
- TimTheTinker 4y agoJust like "on a computer", which allowed many previously unpatentable ideas to be patented (even potentially in previously expired patents).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]