3 ms·
There are also many people who would prefer to not sit next to a human that may droll, vomit, start screaming or otherwise act unpredictably when stressed on a
by nagisa 4y ago
There are also many people who would prefer to not sit next to a human that may droll, vomit, start screaming or otherwise act unpredictably when stressed on a flight.
None of that is unreasonable… is it? That's why I don't fly with my dog (in large part out of concern of their well-being), but maybe airlines should also consider not allowing toddlers on the plane if these things are the concern?
- boopmaster 4y agoOh, wow... was really not expecting "toddlers". Those descriptions of otherwise unpredictably acting humans is not restricted to merely the toddler aged humans.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- thedailymail 4y agoI was a frequent air traveler for around 15 years and would sometimes fantasize about an airline or subsidiary that catered only to human people with, say, 500,000 miles in experience as passengers. No kids, no pets, no rookies. But I am even happier now with my unplanned alternative – no air travel at for 2+ years.
- gumby 4y agoToddlers should be fine as long as they qualify for free cocktails.
- tshaddox 4y agoVery young humans visibly in prolonged intense agony probably shouldn't have been brought onto the plane either.
- Angostura 4y agoGenerally it's frowned upon to put your toddler in a kennel for a week.