3 ms·
1) No 2) Because bail-outs aren't a fundamental property of "the system".
by mseebach 15y ago
1) No
2) Because bail-outs aren't a fundamental property of "the system".
- nknight 15y agoThey are a result of the system. I find it hard to believe that a not-fundamentally-broken system would produce that result. What non-fundamental properties of the system do you think should change to halt now, and prevent in the future, bailouts and related actions (e.g. corporate subsidies)?
- euccastro 15y agoBail-outs are a symptom of plutocracy, which is very much the fundamental nature of the American system (amongst many others).