3 ms·
> However, even if they were just testing, it was ethically, morally, and legally wrong to do so without the consent of the vehicle owner. Aren't ethics and mo
by MerelyMortal 5y ago
> However, even if they were just testing, it was ethically, morally, and legally wrong to do so without the consent of the vehicle owner.
Aren't ethics and morals the same thing here? Also, I wonder what law was being broken, or if the author just thinks it should be illegal.
(FWIW, I do agree that it's not cool to take apart someone else's car without their consent.)
- netsharc 5y agoHeh, this line is probably why people who went to journalism school sneer at bloggers. Although some journalists aren't any better either. I'm really bored so I went through the Turo terms of service[1]. It seems they violated this term: > When you book a vehicle on the Services, you must use the vehicle only for your personal use and not for any commercial purposes (e.g. driving other passengers for a fee such as through Uber or Lyft or delivering food or other packages) unless you have express written permission from the Turo Legal Department in advance or as otherwise described here. Also in the prohibited uses list[2] (although they seem to have messed up their list indenting at that point): > - Prohibited vehicle uses and activities include: > [...] > - Making any unapproved alterations, additions, or improvements to any vehicle [1] https://turo.com/us/en/policies/terms https://turo.com/us/en/policies/terms [2] https://help.turo.com/en_us/prohibited-uses-Hyi0E4l49 https://help.turo.com/en_us/prohibited-uses-Hyi0E4l49
- MerelyMortal 5y agoToS is not a law.