> enabling things in a way that they are otherwise unlikely to be enabled Why were these things unlikely to be enabled in the first place? Maybe it wasn't wort

> enabling things in a way that they are otherwise unlikely to be enabled Why were these things unlikely to be enabled in the first place? Maybe it wasn't worth the hassle (even though it is free)? Maybe people couldn't agree on one solution (even though there are a 1000 blockchains with their mutually incompatible systems)? Or more cynically, maybe no one needed "worse SSO" in the first place and this is just attempt #245 to find a problem for our favourite solution.