3 ms·
I mean, if it doesn't count as an implementation of an actor system, then I'm not sure what does, regardless of whether it was incidental to the design goals of
by bitwalker 4y ago
I mean, if it doesn't count as an implementation of an actor system, then I'm not sure what does, regardless of whether it was incidental to the design goals of Erlang as a language. It certainly walks and quacks like an actor system in my opinion, and I don't think you have to squint very hard at all to see it.
Perhaps we have different ideas of what an "actor system" is though.
- macintux 4y agoDr. Hewitt typically chimes in on these threads to emphasize some of the differences between his model and Erlang. I don’t recall his username to locate some of those.