3 ms·
2. and 3. sound like advantages to me. 1. seems straightforward, it would be better if a language was faster. 4. is debatable, most programs are not big, so m
by Ambolia 4y ago
2. and 3. sound like advantages to me.
1. seems straightforward, it would be better if a language was faster.
4. is debatable, most programs are not big, so most programmers shouldn't need to use a programming language better suited for big programs, as long as it provides other advantages, if they are not going to build a big program.
- jredwards 4y agoPython prioritizes human time over machine time. Human time is expensive. Machine time is cheap. There are also many, MANY ways to make it faster if it actually matters, but it rarely does.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]